Abstract:
ABSTRACT
Developing Key Performance Indicators for Buildings Maintenance
Management
By
Suror Hameed Ramadan
Supervised by: Co- supervisor:
Asst. Prof. Ali Hussein Hameed Prof. Dr. Waleed Mustafa Khammas
Maintenance management key performance indicators (KPIs) are
essential for many construction projects. Structural buildings, public
government buildings, need a regular Assessment of maintenance
performance, which contributes to the success of the organization through
continuous improvement of performance. As a result, performance indicators
among the ways to evaluate the success of organizational performance and to
demonstrate the organization's effectiveness in achieving its goals through its
strategy. The purpose of this research is to identify an appropriate set of key
performance indicators for maintenance management in construction projects.
A preliminary questionnaire was prepared, and it was distributed to a
group of engineers, specialists, and experts in various governmental
departments, to assess the state of maintenance performance in construction
projects. The results showed that there is no periodic follow-up of the
s well as the absence of professional development of
employees and their training through a training course, in addition to the lack
of consideration during the design and construction phase of how maintenance
is performed.
According to the reality of maintenance performance, a second
questionnaire was prepared to know and identify the main performance
indicators for maintenance. Then the questionnaire was distributed to
VIII
experienced engineers in a number of public buildings. Next, the relative
importance indicator method was used to find weights for each perspective
and its indicators. The questionnaire analysis obtained (16) key performance
indicators for the maintenance of buildings divided into four views, financial,
customers, learning and growth, and internal business. The results indicate
that the measurement of the performance of buildings is not only dependent on
financial indicators. On this basis, it is recommended to use financial and nonfinancial
indicators of building as a key factor for measurement and
continuous improvement.
Finally, to obtain more accurate and realistic data, the final list of
indicators was applied in case studies that included (5) maintenance projects
for government buildings. Through the analysis of the results of the case
studies, it became clear that despite the importance of these indicators, there
was a significant weakness in the application of these indicators in the
construction projects. Weights were calculated for the extent of the indicators'
importance as well as the extent of the indicators' application. These indicators
were the basis for developing a computer system for maintenance
management using indicators. Through the proposed system, it was possible to
develop the reality of maintenance performance in construction projects